Accessible and Attractive sites
Home / Site Building & Testing / Accessible and Attractive sites
http://www.accessify.com/...
Got any good 'uns to add?
Note: extra brownie points for highlighting corporate sites (blog sites are easy pickings!)
_________________
Build Your Own Web Site the Right Way!
A beginners' HTML/CSS book with web standards at its heart
The Ultimate HTML Reference
A complete reference, in glorious hardback
Can we add ourselves? We've been taking some great advice from Gez, Kajun, and Nigel on accessible design, and feel we've got a good balance of aesthetics and usability.
See www.designory.co.uk - all opinions gratefully received
_________________
Designory :: Design & Marketing
tel: (0845) 056 8392
www.designory.co.uk
One of the sites I just finished is css/xhtml 1 strict based. And has had alot of attention put into its accessibility. Here is the uri: http://www.pardons.org
I belive it fits the "corporate" criteria, it is a large non-profit organization in Canada. A better description of what they do is in their about section.
Last I checked it passes WAI level 1,2,3. But if anyone can find any faults or room for improvement please let me know.
_________________
};-) http://www.xhtmlcoder.com/
WVYFC chose the Yorkshire Air Ambulance as the main charity to fund raise for in 2006
It may be an idea to post them on the site critiques board first, as it would add more weight to the validity of the entry if other members agree it is good. Pardons Canada looks a really well designed to me, and accessible from a quick glance. Because of the nature of criticism, you may not receive a reply, as it's easier to be negatively critical that it is positively critical. Maybe the board should be called member's best practice, where we talk about accessibility/markup issues that are exemplary in terms of best practice, as well as highlighting potential problems?
| designory wrote: |
|
See www.designory.co.uk - all opinions gratefully received |
http://www.designory.co.uk/...
THis page is not XHTML 1 strict-
"Line 86, column 134: non SGML character number 146
...ng, content, and usability issues, were here to help.</p>"
_________________
--
Kev
http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk
Being a curious little person I had a quick look at both Designory and Pardons. I agree, they look good but I noticed that both have the same problem. When using the Size button on the IE toolbar the font stays the same size rather than adjusting up or down.
I see from the source that Designory use px and Pardon has no noticable reference to font. It might help those who need a larger typeface if you first specify the font family i.e.
{font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;}
placing this just under the <body> line
The default font size can then be altered by using <font size="4"> blah </font> or any number between 1 & 7 (I think
Keep up the good work
_________________
Mike Abbott
Accessible to everyone
You're correct about the font resizing issue, but font size="4" isn't the answer. Designory has been pointed in the right direction on the critiques board, and Pardons Canada would also be best dealt with over there, should it be submitted.
The reason I suggested posting over there first, is it saves the thread going off topic, as this one has.
| designory wrote: |
| Can we add ourselves? |
Added: http://www.accessify.com/...
_________________
Build Your Own Web Site the Right Way!
A beginners' HTML/CSS book with web standards at its heart
The Ultimate HTML Reference
A complete reference, in glorious hardback
| lloydi wrote: |
|
Added: http://www.accessify.com/... |
Well I was obviously wrong with my assumption lol. Designory claims Level "AAA" conformance, but has a way to go yet. It's encouraging he's so keen to address the issues, but I'm surprised it was added as an exemplary site as they're not yet addressed.
| gez wrote: |
| Well I was obviously wrong with my assumption lol. |
Well, I've posted about a site - http://www.trinity.ox.ac.uk/ - over in the Critique section, as per your suggestion, and would be very happy for it be added as an exemplary site if it is deemed to be so.
ATB,
Matthew
_________________
Accessible: Live Departure Boards, UK Train Timetables, Odeon no more
Last edited by Matthew on 06 Sep 2003 03:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
thanks
http://www.cybo.co.uk
*easy: well, colourful anyway!
| lloydi wrote: |
| Added: http://www.accessify.com/... |
very happy to see Lee Jeans in that list - as you say, finally a large corporate - strict too
_________________
cheers
Wicksie
IWDP | Independent Testers | IT Gazette
The future is bright - The future is #0099cc
We recently released our home page and primary news sites:
http://www.utsa.edu/
http://www.utsa.edu/...
Both are table-less and have many accessibility features built in. Let me know what you think!
htpp://www.bhpbilliton.com
A few points:
- Built with valid XHTML 1.0 Transistional and CSS
Site scales down in text only browsers
The drop down navs are replaced with a text link to the sitemap for navigation in text only browsers
Forms use fieldset, label tags etc
All times are GMT
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


