Log in

Accessify Forum - Accessibility Discussion

Latest Tweets

Err. Sorry. Haven't quite got the hang of multiple accounts on @seesmic just yet! :-(

Yesterday

@mollydotcom going on the #HTML5 demystification! :-)

Yesterday

Web #accessibility training in Edinburgh this fall: about WCAG2, understand WAI-ARIA, more http://www.rnib.org.uk... - Gary

2 days ago, RT: @webaxe

Blog RE practical research into #HTML5 & #accessibility - http://www.accessiblec... by @jkiss - Gary

2 days ago, RT: @stcaccess RT @Meera404

.@v may I suggest you add November's Accessing Higher Ground accessibility conference to lanyrd.com, too? http://j.mp/bbPai...

2 days ago, RT: @stcaccess

Read more...

Article Critique Only Please

  • Reply to topic
  • Post new topic

Home / Site Critiques / Article Critique Only Please

Reply with quote I was answering a question for someone on automated accessibility testing and I ended up wandering off the subject a little and just basically talking about how I would test for accessibility.

So I wrote it up as an article.

Would appreciate any feedback on the content of the article. I am not, repeat not asking for a site critique. Okay?
_________________
Jack Pickard The Pickards Information Services| Blog | Twit
Reply with quote Hi JackP

As an Introduction, I think it's really good, you already answered the 'logo' question from my other post.

I think it would be worth following up with some more 'in depth' articles but written plainly as you have in this one - its far easier to read than the WCAG checkpoints

webecho
_________________
Australian Website Design
Reply with quote I think you explain very clearly any step you have to do for a good web accessibility. But no need to tell a lot like that, you should make your text smaller and compacted if you see what i mean Smile. I'm doing my website and i know how its like to write small text and compacted....
_________________
Website Promotion Guide | Seo Forum
Reply with quote One thing i've noticed Jack, is that you don't mention downloading any actual screen-readers.

You can get trial versions of some of them, including IBM Home Page Reader, and Window Eyes. Unfortunately, last time I checked, JAWS was only available as a 40-minute trial !

Otherwise a good introduction to testing for accessibility.
Reply with quote yeah, that was kind of deliberate. I've noticed when talking about accessibility testing that if you start asking people with good vision to use a screenreader they tend to freeze, switch off and tune you out. It may be just my experience but people think they sound really complicated and scary.

So I deliberately wanted to keep the article to a kind of "you're new to this? that's okay, just hold my hand and I'll walk you along the way a little bit". In probably a less creepy way than that sounded.

Plus I think you need decent experience with a screenreader before you're approaching the way a standard screenreader user would use it, so it's not necessarily of that much benefit.

I should maybe add a footnote about them though, indicating that if you want to improve on the way you do this testing etc etc etc.
_________________
Jack Pickard The Pickards Information Services| Blog | Twit
Reply with quote
JackP wrote:
you're new to this? that's okay, just hold my hand and I'll walk you along the way a little bit


Run - It's the Stephen King of Website Accessibility
_________________
Australian Website Design
Reply with quote Testing JavaScript?
_________________
};-) http://www.xhtmlcoder.com/

WVYFC chose the Yorkshire Air Ambulance as the main charity to fund raise for in 2006
Reply with quote
Robert Wellock wrote:
Testing JavaScript?

ooh good one. that's a glaring miss. thanks.

  • Reply to topic
  • Post new topic

Display posts from previous:   

All times are GMT

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum