Log in   Register a New Account

Accessify Forum - Discuss Website Accessibility

New to the forum?

Only an email address is required.

Register Here

Already registered? Log In

Accessibility wording issues

Reply with quote Hi, I've ran into an issue with a web course I am building.
In the course I have an interactive flash video that relies on using a mouse-over, It is also keyboard accessible.

The problem I am having is the wording for the flash instructions. I was informed that I cannot use directions such as "roll your mouse" because not everyone uses a computer mouse, and cannot use "or tab " because not everyone uses a keyboard. There could be an instance that a user does not use either a keyboard or a mouse and using terms like that could be discriminatory.

How could I word the instructions so that it can be followed by everyone?

Anyone have an idea?

Thank you
Reply with quote I run into this from time to time. For "click such-and-such" like a link or a button, I tend to use "hit send" or similar. Still, to "click a link" seems to have become accepted nomenclature for activating a link. But a mouse over is obviously trickier. How about something like, "use the [some identifiable object that people are supposed to hover over] to do [something]"?
Reply with quote Yes, it's definitely tricky, when I have a link to click on I generally use the term select the link. An instance like I have where I'm using a flash file really gets confusing, where I cannot use terms like shapes and colours, cannot use logo, photo, image, but I can use terms like video, chart, graph which to me is kind of silly, if a video is a moving photo, why can I not say photo for compliance?

Thank you for your thoughts dotjay, your comment gave me an idea. I'm thinking what I can do is simply say "review the comments below" or something along that line. I also have a text only version of the flash file which pretty much speaks for itself.

I think I may try that and see if it passes my compliance test.

Thanks again
Reply with quote This language is technical, not personal, so there seem to be no grounds for a case of discrimination.

Users of alternative peripherals still understand what a "click" is. Even if their using and interaction straw and biting, sucking or blowing instead of clicking. Or if their using eye-tracking to wink or blink.

Now, for keyboards and other discrete access mechanisms. "Tabbing" seems like uber-geek jargon, so probably best avoid that entirely. The notion of a "click" usually translates fine to keyboards, switches and so forth. (These make a mechanical noise when operated.)

For voice activation, the instruction you issue is usually "click link text" or similar. So that type of AT is fine with normal instructions, too. Smile

Display posts from previous:   

All times are GMT

  • Reply to topic
  • Post new topic