Creating websites with WYSIWYG
Should WYSIWYG software vendors be more proactive with inbuilt accessibility support?
Yes
83%
[ 20 ]
No
4%
[ 1 ]
Unsure
0%
[ 0 ]
Don't care (shame, boo, hiss)
12%
[ 3 ]
Total Votes : 24
bah you're 5 positions above me on google 'web design sheffield' :)
lol
mark (newmediadesigns.co.uk)
Share: 
'web design uk'
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=web+design+uk
Accessify Forum Administrator ~ Nigel Peck / MIS Web Design
"Everything I say is not meant to be set in stone" - Van Morrison
Share:
My experience with DWMX2004 has generally been more positive than with the original DWMX but there are some strange omissions from the CSS "library" such as :focus, :first-child and position:fixed. It also displays font-variant:small-caps as all capital letters.
I recognize that some of these items have poorer support than other CSS properties/values but :focus has pretty good support I thought so I am curious as to why this one has been omitted from the properties.
Jules
Share:
Aside from Macromedia (as more vendors should really be doing this!), see:
http://xstandard.com/page.asp?p=7658F20E-2237-470E-A59A-F2917B36D680 for a XHTML-outputting WYSIWYG editor product.
Anyone care to comment or review?
Share:
I like this editor. Most editors hide accessibility functions behind many layers of menus - while this editor puts in right in your face. I like that there is a distinction between layout and data tables, the table summaries and image alt text is required and the screen reader feature is pretty neat. I think the best thing they have done is got rid of the font/colour picker.
But this is not a replacement for DW - which is a page layout tool. I think this editor is only for non-technical users to contribute content as part of a CM system.
Share:
W3C are actually evaluating tools for web creation, and have a working group at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2002/tools
Not particularly up to date, but may be of interest to some of us
Share: