Log in

Accessify Forum - Accessibility Discussion

Latest Tweets

W3C Releases Unicorn, an All-in-One Validator http://ow.ly/18jtbB #accessibility #a11y #axs - Gary

3 days ago, RT: @mpaciello RT @w3c

@msmousette You’re welcome, Liz! – @dotjay

22/07/2010

@Elin012 Sorry for delay. The study has now ended. They were after native English-speaking, 18+, not visually or cognitively disabled.

22/07/2010

From @msmousette: “Many thanks to everyone who helped [with the web study] - they had a great response.” –@dotjay

22/07/2010

Native-English speakers: Able to help with a 15 min. accessibility web study? http://www.accessifyfo...@dotjay

21/07/2010

Read more...

Currently Online

No registered users are online.

Rich editing environment

  • Reply to topic
  • Post new topic

Home / Site Building & Testing / Rich editing environment

Reply with quote We've got a project on the go at the moment that'll require a simple rich-text editing environment. We're not going to be able to use a plugin (sorry xStandard) so we're going to have to go for a pure-JS solution on the front end. How would people do this and still make it accessible? Priority 6.3 of WCAG1.0 says the page still has to be usable when scripting is turned off so do you think it's reasonable for page to degrade to a standard textarea into which the users can enter simple HTML (e.g. h*, p, strong, em, etc)?
_________________
Web Developer, Kyanmedia
Reply with quote That sounds reasonable to me.

I think FCK is a javascript editor which sits on top of a standard textarea in a html form:

http://www.fckeditor.net/

I've played around a little bit with it, quite a long time ago, but never tried using it in practice.
_________________
Jim O'Donnell
work: Royal Observatory Greenwich
play: eatyourgreens
Reply with quote pet peeve of mine:
so people without javascript are required to learn HTML then?


but basically so long as the wysiwyg is an enhancemnet, then there is no problem. The default will be a textarea that users can edit.

Now can you find a wysiwyg editor that produces good clean code Smile
_________________
my mind is on a permanent tangent
Reply with quote
Quote:
so people without javascript are required to learn HTML then?


I don't like it any more that you do Sad Luckily in this case the set of all users is actually going to be fairly small so tuition might be a possibility, and the set of HTML elements that are going to be allowed is probably going to be very limited (at a guess h1-6, hr, p, strong, em, a).

EatYourGreens: yep, seen that before. We'll probably end up implementing our own though as tends to happen in these cases.
_________________
Web Developer, Kyanmedia
Reply with quote
Quote:
Now can you find a wysiwyg editor that produces good clean code


From what I've heard, xStandard is what you want! The trouble is most RTE environments out there a simply a Javascript wrapper around contentEditable which is notorious for producing awful code. The other options are a Java applet or Flash swf, or a dedicated plugin like xStandard.
_________________
Web Developer, Kyanmedia
Reply with quote
elfin wrote:
pet peeve of mine:
so people without javascript are required to learn HTML then?


you could offer an alternative where they can write textile, for instance...
_________________
Patrick H. Lauke / webmaster / University of Salford
co-lead: WaSP Accesibility Task Force
take it to the streets ... WaSP Street Team
personal: splintered | photographia | redux
co-author: Web Accessibility - Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance
Reply with quote Thanks redux, that's a good point and I'll bring it up. Although considering the restrictions on HTML we'll be having it might be 6 of one, half a dozen of the other.
_________________
Web Developer, Kyanmedia
Reply with quote
redux wrote:
elfin wrote:
pet peeve of mine:
so people without javascript are required to learn HTML then?


you could offer an alternative where they can write textile, for instance...


LOL thats why I constructed the toolbar over on Quirm.net a sort of halfway house.
_________________
my mind is on a permanent tangent
Reply with quote You could look at Xinha - FCK has been getting a lot of support recently. I would still suggest you hook HTML tidy in behind it though.
_________________
Red Ant
Reply with quote Thanks Richard, I haven't seen Xinha before like FCK it looks massively overkill for the project we're working on Smile Stiil, useful for future reference. Oh, and of course HTML Tidy would be used in the backend.
_________________
Web Developer, Kyanmedia
Reply with quote I personally use the .NET version of FCK Editor and I think it does the job. I always use several javascript config files in the background so I can have multiple FCK editors displayed in different pages with different set of features depending on the needs of the user.

As far as accessibility goes, you can tab into the text area and tab out, so as long as you don't require the user to use the editor's formatting features, this is acceptable isn't it?
_________________
Kieron McIntyre
www.digbyswift.com

  • Reply to topic
  • Post new topic

Display posts from previous:   

All times are GMT

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum